Close Menu
Greenland Review
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Greenland Review
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • News
    • Arctic affairs
    • Sports
    Greenland Review
    Home » Fishing Quota Decision Remains Unresolved
    News

    Fishing Quota Decision Remains Unresolved

    Greenland ReviewBy Greenland ReviewOctober 18, 2025035 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Fishing Quota Decision Remains Unresolved
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Certainly! Here’s a refined version of your article that maintains the original content while enhancing its readability and flow.


    Jens-Frederik Nielsen Faces Pressing Challenges Over Halibut Quotas

    At 34, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, the chairman of Naalakkersuisut and a member of the Demokraatit party, is grappling with significant pressures surrounding halibut quotas valued in the hundreds of millions of kroner.

    Growing Tensions in the Fishing Industry

    The fishing sector is pressing for prompt clarity regarding the self-government’s offer of halibut, cod, and saithe quotas for new entrants. These quotas were announced on February 7 of this year. However, as the summer draws to a close, anticipation has turned into frustration; the fishing community expected a decision on which companies would receive the 4,600 tonnes of halibut and the corresponding quotas for the two other species months ago.

    As the delay stretches on, Sermitsiaq reached out to Nielsen for insights into the ongoing situation.

    “In our government, we need to arrive at a consensus, which I will present,” Nielsen stated. “That process is currently underway, and we are aware that time is running short. We are committed to finding a solution.”

    Nielsen accepted full responsibility for the delay in decisions regarding the quotas. “As the leader of Naalakkersuisut, it falls on me to ensure that this decision is made, and I recognize that we have yet to accomplish that,” he admitted.

    Navigating Election Pressures

    Questions have arisen regarding potential disagreements within Naalakkersuisut that could be contributing to the holdup. Nielsen acknowledged the reality:

    “It’s no secret that during the recent election campaign, we did not reach consensus on certain aspects of fishing policy. I take responsibility for the impasse. We are actively working towards a resolution, but for various reasons, I can’t divulge the specific direction we’re heading.”

    Quotas at Stake

    Curiosity looms over whether established entities like Royal Greenland and Polar Seafood will receive the coveted quotas, or if newer players will emerge victorious.

    “At this moment, I cannot comment on who the recipients may be,” said Nielsen, asserting the need for prompt decision-making.

    Last December, the former Naalakkersuisut, led by Múte B. Egede, decided to put the 4,600 tonnes of halibut, along with 1,950 tonnes of cod and 166.6 tonnes of saithe, up for tender as a means of diversifying the industry and granting opportunities to emerging players. A total of 12 applicants—comprised largely of new companies—submitted their bids when the quotas were tendered in February.

    In mid-June, the Department of Fisheries and Fisheries assured journalists that a decision would be forthcoming by the month’s end.

    Urgent Need for Action

    The urgency of the situation is palpable as halibut fishing companies, including Royal Greenland, Qaleralik, Polar Seafood Greenland, and Sigguk, face the prospect of their current quotas being exhausted over the next few weeks. Without new allocations, operations could come to a halt.

    “We understand this is a pressing issue,” Nielsen confirmed. “We are working diligently to find a resolution. The government must reach a unified decision, and I will be taking the lead in that process.”

    Economic Implications

    The stakes extend far beyond the fishing industry. The delay in quota distribution poses a financial risk to the self-government, threatening to leave its coffers bereft of expected income from taxes and fees. Christian Keldsen, director of Greenland’s Chamber of Commerce, expressed his concerns:

    “If these quotas aren’t allocated soon, we’re likely to see fishing companies forced to dock their ships and lay off employees. It’s a situation that demands urgent attention.”

    According to reports, if the 4,600 tonnes of halibut go unallocated this year, Landskassen could lose between 40 and 50 million kroner in tax revenues, not to mention the significant turnover for the fishing companies that could benefit from these quotas.

    The Impact on Established Companies

    Royal Greenland, a significant player in the sector, has received notice from the self-government that it stands to lose 2,700 tonnes of halibut this year—a situation exacerbated by the new fisheries law. CEO Preben Sunke acknowledged the potential consequences:

    “A loss of this magnitude not only impacts us financially but could also affect local facilities and the broader Greenlandic community. This development is indeed deeply concerning.”

    Looking Ahead

    The Greenland Economic Council too has raised alarms over the uncertainty surrounding halibut quotas and the implications of reserving a third of this year’s total for new entrants, further complicating matters for existing companies.

    As the window for fishing this year’s quotas closes, the issue cannot be resolved by new players, industry insiders agree; the existing stakeholders may soon find themselves bearing the brunt of this ongoing dilemma.

    Meanwhile, the appetite for Greenlandic halibut in markets like China continues to grow, yet new companies face protracted delays—sometimes up to a year—in obtaining the necessary export permits. If distribution of quotas occurs this year, some new entrants may have to rely on established companies for they may not have time to secure permits independently.

    In these uncertain times, all eyes are on Jens-Frederik Nielsen and his administration as they navigate a complex web of industry expectations, political pressures, and economic ramifications.


    This revision enhances the storytelling aspect of the article while maintaining its original intent and information.

    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Greenland Review
    Greenland Review
    • Website

    Related Posts

    KNAPK Loses Million-Dollar Salmon Legal Battle

    October 29, 2025

    Greenland Wins Favorable Ruling from Arbitration Court

    October 29, 2025

    New Water and Ice Package Aims to Attract Investors

    October 29, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Demo

    New Head of KNR Department Appointed

    October 30, 2025

    Chilly Dips and Cozy Greetings: A Unique Experience

    October 29, 2025

    KNAPK Loses Million-Dollar Salmon Legal Battle

    October 29, 2025

    20 Women Seek Compensation for Forced Contraception

    October 29, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Demo
    About
    About

    Greenland Review brings you independent news, culture, and insights from across Greenland. Stay informed with trusted stories, in-depth features, and local perspectives.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube

    New Head of KNR Department Appointed

    October 30, 2025

    Chilly Dips and Cozy Greetings: A Unique Experience

    October 29, 2025

    KNAPK Loses Million-Dollar Salmon Legal Battle

    October 29, 2025

    20 Women Seek Compensation for Forced Contraception

    October 29, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2025 GreenlandReview.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.